Chain of Command:Abyssinia – Ethiopian Chitet


In this post we introduce the main protagonist against the Italians, the Ethiopian forces led by emperor Haile Selassie (seen above in topee), defenders of their homeland. Off course historically these were the two countries that fought the real Italo-Ethiopian War and thus the actual conflict can be gamed by using the Italian and Ethiopian lists alone, the British and French being an addition as part of The Abyssinian Crisis counterfactual.

The Ethiopian forces are diverse. They embody true feudal warfare culture all the way through to the Imperial Guard as a modern European style force trained and organised by Belgium and Swedish military missions – there is a lot of new and interesting concepts for Chain of Command players in these Ethiopian lists…I hope players embrace game play with these diverse armies.

We shall start with the Ethiopian Chitet list, move onto the Mehal Sefari ‘organised’ forces and finally the Kebur Zabanga, the Ethiopian Imperial Guard. These lists will bring a new dimension to game play and provide many options for those wanting to try something different in their Chain of Command games.

As an aside – for those that are downloading and looking at these lists, any discussion or points of confusion that you feel need clarification would be appreciated. When constructing these lists sometimes only a fresh pair of eyes can see an obvious error or mistake and the TAC authors would appreciate that feedback.

So, to the Ethiopians…

The Ethiopian Army on the eve of the Abyssinian Crisis was going through a transition, intended to turn it from an essentially medieval feudal army, albeit with a lot of rifles and machine guns, into a modern army, with regular forces backed by a territorial militia. This process had barely begun by the time the Italians invaded in 1935. Ethiopia’s military consisted of two main components. Firstly there were the full-time soldiers, typically found in the Zabanga (the ‘gendarmerie’ of Addis Adaba), or the Sefari (armies) of individual provincial rulers (Ras). Secondly there were the able-bodied men of military age, who like anywhere in the world, were liable to temporary conscription for the duration of a conflict; the ‘citizen army’, although many authors choose the term ‘levy’ for reasons of their own.



Traditional Force of the Chitet

Haile Selassie was attempting to produce a modern style army with his efforts with both his own Kebur Zebanga (Imperial Guard) and his Mehal Sefari (the army he inherited as a provincial ruler in his own right). He had no real influence over the other Sefari, as these were under the control of the other Rases, who were responsible for the training, maintenance and equipment of their armies; the cost of which they paid out of their own coffers. Healthy rivalry or fear of the other Rases did generally mean that each of them maintained their forces to the best of their ability and wealth however. These forces were formed by the the Ethiopian ‘chitet’, the feudal muster or call up of troops organised by the provincial Rases.

The typical Ethiopian possessed the traditional weapons of dagger, along with either a sword or spear, or sometimes both. Shields were routinely carried and varied from the simple to the ornate; none of course could stop a bullet. Individual Ethiopians could possess various firearms, which ranged from modern repeating weapons, or muzzle-loading muskets. As their main use was for hunting, with powder cheap and readily available, and that projectiles could be home-made or even that pebbles could be used if needed, the muzzle-loader was the most practical weapon. Cartridges on the other hand were comparatively expensive and used sparingly.

The victory over the Italians at Adwa in 1896 had resulted in the capture of artillery pieces dating from that time (believed to be mainly 65mm M.85), which when added to weapons bought or captured in previous wars, presented a very eclectic collection of weapons across the whole of the forces of the various Rases. Besides the ubiquitous Maxim-type machine guns, Gardners or Gatlings were also in the arsenals of some Rases and even some 37mm Hotchkiss ‘Revolving Cannon’ (1872) were photographed in Ethiopia. Russian mountain guns (63mm M.83) were apparently sold to the Ethiopians prior to Adwa and of course the Great War had produced a vast surplus of materiel for sale.


The Ethiopian Arsenal

The Ethiopians found an unlikely ally in Hitler, who smarting from Italy’s efforts in quashing the attempted putsch in Austria the previous year, had allowed arms sales to the Ethiopians to go ahead. Apparently 10,000 Mauser rifles and millions of cartridges were despatched, along with sixty field and anti-tank guns (37mm L41). While some of these, most notably the anti-tank guns, were detained by the French at Djibouti when the arms embargo was applied, some did get through prior to that.

Other weapon sales included 175 FN FM mle D (Browning Automatic Rifles), some 450 ZB vz. 30 light machine guns, along with unknown quantities of Hotchkiss mle 1914 medium machine guns, Madsen M.34/35 tripod-mounted light machine guns, Hotchkiss mle 1922 light machine guns and a number of 20mm cannon (SEMAG-Becker ‘L’, Oerlikon M.23 and Oerlikon M.28/31). Heavier types included Brandt mle 1928 medium mortars, 75mm mle 1897 field guns and some Skoda guns, which may or may not have beaten the embargo.

The bulk of these most recent purchases went to the Kebur Zebanga and the Mehal Sefari, but others, as well as weapons existing on the international ‘Black Market’ found their way to Addis Adaba, to be snapped up at highly inflated prices by any Ras wanting to impress his fellows and of course defeat the Italians.


Traditional Ethiopian Organisation

The traditional decimal structure of Ethiopian armies is fairly well-documented and the ranks that were used have in fact survived into the modern Ethiopian Army; although their literal meaning has been abstracted to suit modern organisation patterns. Units were ‘ten’, ‘fifty’, a ‘hundred’, ‘five hundred’ a ‘thousand’ and so forth; any combination that could be expressed by the use of the fingers on one or two hands. Leaders were ‘leaders of ten’ and so on in equal measure. The baluch or ‘half-company’ of fifty was the equivalent of the platoon in European-style armies.

Too much should not be placed on the use of specific numbers however. The hazb or ‘band’ of ten men could in fact be anything between six and fifteen men. Five men would be amalgamated with another small hazb to bring them into the region of ten men, while more than fifteen men would be split into two smaller hazb. This carried over into larger units, so potentially a baluch could be anything from thirty to seventy-five men and so-on up the chain of command. The only fixed rule seems to be that there were five hazb to a baluch and two baluch to a meto (hundred).

The Sefari of an individual Ras would therefore contain the professional forces he paid and equipped, who were typically rifle-armed men supported by small numbers of automatic and artillery, supplemented by numerous formations of tribesmen under those chieftains and tribal heads who were subservient to him. The Ras would supplement the spears, swords and firearms of these groups, with firearms of his own from his personal arsenal, as would his subordinates from theirs. The bulk of the men however, would still be relying on sword or spear, as the rifle ultimately was not the weapon of the warrior in close combat.


Ethiopian Chitet army list


12 thoughts on “Chain of Command:Abyssinia – Ethiopian Chitet

  1. Pingback: Lard Island News

  2. Small change. The Marksman choice is a support list one item, not support list three – the file has been updated.


    • This is odd, but I understand it is a game. There is little or no evidence that the Italian army used Snipers or Marksman up through WW2. They certainly didn’t have specialized sniper rifles. I don’t believe it was a part of their tactical doctrine either. Do you have a source that says it is?



      • Hi Dave,

        Marksmen in this thread refers to an Ethiopian ‘chosen man’, not an Italian.

        However in relation to the Italians, whilst they didn’t have ‘snipers’ as an official post, what they had were men qualified by earning the ‘Tiratore Scelto’ – a standard marksmanship badge. Whether an individual marksman had the skill to be equivalent to an actual sniper in modern terms, would be debatable.

        But in game terms, ‘marksmen’ is a somewhat loose term for a suitably capable individual that satisfies the role in an on-table platoon and is equally capable through training or accrued battlefield experience.


        Happy W


  3. Correction – delete Support List One for ‘one man to each section’ – this is not required. Additional men are taken in 5 man groups as a Support List One choice.


  4. Pingback: Ethiopian Chitet - Lardy Lists

  5. Hey there. I don’t play the mini-based game referenced. But I do play other games and have been researching this conflict for over a year. The Ethiopians used such a dizzying array of weapons, it is difficult to identify and verify them all. May I ask what your source is for naming such weapons like the Madsen M34/35 MG, Hotchkiss 1922 LMGs, Stokes mortars, Maxim-type MGs, and the variants of the Oerlikon 20mm AA gun??? I cannot find evidence for these specfic weapons being used by the Ethiopians anywhere. I can share the lists my research has revealed.

    Thanks, and good work!


      • Yes, I actually contributed to that thread. 🙂

        I’ve only read two books, DeBoca’s “War in Ethiopia” or someting, and “Prevail” by Pierce, which seemed to be to politicized for my tastes, I also have a couple Osprey volumes on the topic, in addition to 20-30 books on 20th century firearms. But actually, most of the info I find is online.

        Any good books besides those you can recommend?


  6. Hi Dave,

    When I get back home (I travel alot!) I’ll looks a few more titles. I agree, Prevail, was a little to PC for me which was a disappointment…and a missed opportunity.

    As I have mentioned in my other posts regarding some book titles DeBoca’s book was very good IMO as is Badoglio: “La Guerra D’Ethiopia: The War in Abyssinia”. The best starting point is obviously Anthony Mockler’s Haile Selassie’s War – this should be everyone’s first read…I would then follow up with DeBoca’s book, which I found quite fair and balanced.

    More titles though worth a look are here;

    I’m sure there are good Italian sources but that’s beyond my reach.


    Happy W


  7. A closer look and useful titles include;

    Italy’s Conquest of Abyssinia – Newman
    The War in Abyssinia – Badoglio
    Italian Invasion of Abyssinia – Nicolle
    Maneuver In War – U.S. Marine Corps
    Military Observers Reports – Fiske

    No doubt there are lots of tid-bits of info in a host of more obscure or less easily accessible titles – the period is scattered around in a wide selection of source material. Frankly it just takes, as you know, hours of digging…;-)


    • Awesome! I’ve ordered Mockler’s work. I’ve read De Boca years ago, but I’ll take a second look. I’ve read Nicolle’s book (Osprey) as well; It’s a bit short, but rich in content. The Osprey books have a gem every once in a while. The one on Adwa 1896 is also good.

      I wasn’t aware Badoglio’s stuff was translated into English. Another good one to keep me busy.

      Thanks again,


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s